Variability in the application of materials in the physical education session
Keywords:
Alternative materials, Inclusion, Motor learning, Physical education, Practice variabilityAbstract
This theoretical-documentary narrative review addresses the problem of homogenising teaching practices in Physical Education, which may limit motor development and inclusion by relying exclusively on conventional resources. The purpose of the study is to analyse the pedagogical, motor, and motivational impact of variability in the application of teaching resources within the session. Methodologically, it is based on an analytical-documentary review of foundational works on motor learning, structured around Schmidt's schema theory, non-linear pedagogy, and the Constraints-Led Approach. The analysis suggests that the deliberate and systematic manipulation of the physical and contextual properties of materials (conventional, alternative, and self-constructed) may act as a relevant constraint on the motor response, which could theoretically be related to greater motor adaptability, the involvement of executive processes, and a more finely tuned dosage of muscular force. Likewise, the reviewed literature proposes that the use of alternative and self-constructed materials may foster intrinsic motivation by satisfying the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness (Ryan & Deci, 2000), reducing social anxiety and exclusion barriers for students with motor or sensory diversity. It is concluded that material variability is not a logistical palliative but an intentional didactic strategy with the potential to democratise the school playground and promote a versatile and lasting physical literacy (Whitehead, 2010).
References
Blández, J. (1995). La utilización del material y del espacio en Educación Física. INDE.
Carl, J., Barratt, J., Töpfer, C., Cairney, J., & Pfeifer, K. (2022). How are physical literacy interventions conceptualized? A systematic review on intervention design and content. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 58, 102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102091
Chow, J. Y., Meerhoff, L. A., Choo, C. Z. Y., Button, C., & Tan, B. S. (2023). The effect of nonlinear pedagogy on the acquisition of game skills in a territorial game. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1077065. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077065
Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Human Kinetics.
Kaloka, P. T., Nopembri, S., Yudanto, Y., & Elumalai, G. (2024). Improvement of executive function through cognitively challenging physical activity with nonlinear pedagogy in elementary schools. Retos, 51, 673–682. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v51.101024
Méndez-Giménez, A. (2008). Modelos actuales de iniciación deportiva: Un enfoque constructivista y comprensivo. Wanceulen.
Méndez-Giménez, A., Carriedo, A., Fernández-Río, J., & Cecchini, J. A. (2023). Self-made material in physical education: Teacher perceptions of the use of an emerging pedagogical model before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Physical Education Review, 29(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X221118548
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education (5.ª ed.). Benjamin Cummings.
Ruiz Pérez, L. M. (2005). Moverse con dificultad en la escuela: Introducción a los problemas de competencia motriz. Wanceulen.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4), 225–260.
Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Electrónica Desafíos Educativos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
