Reconfiguring the Classroom in the Face of Artificial Intelligence: A Proposed Didactic Adaptation Strategy for Teachers Without Advanced Technological Training
Keywords:
Classroom reconfiguration, Didactic adaptation, Digital competence, Generative artificial intelligence, Higher education, Proposal-based strategyAbstract
The vertiginous emergence of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has caused a methodological disruption in higher education, weakening traditional evaluation systems based on written products completed outside the classroom and generating uncertainty among teaching staff. The purpose of this article is to propose a methodological framework oriented to the reconfiguration of the face-to-face classroom space as a viable didactic adaptation strategy for teachers without advanced technological training. Methodologically, the study corresponds to qualitative research of a descriptive-documentary typology, based on the hermeneutic method and content analysis, examining an intentional sample of scientific and institutional documents published between 1986 and 2026, with particular emphasis on recent literature on generative AI published between 2023 and 2026. The main results materialize in the design of a proposal structured in three operational dimensions: the inversion of the evaluative process within the classroom, the diversification of real-time performance evidence, and the co-design of challenges based on local-context problems. According to the documentary review conducted, it is inferred that pedagogical resilience in the face of technological change would not require specialized programming skills, but rather a transformation of face-to-face teaching; the proposal suggests that shifting the weight of formative assessment from the final automated product toward the synchronous, face-to-face process could allow the teacher to regain greater control of educational mediation and potentially favor more effective scaffolding of critical thinking, an assumption that should be corroborated through subsequent empirical studies.
References
Area-Moreira, M., Valverde-Berrocoso, J., & Rubia-Avi, B. (Eds.). (2026). Transformación digital de la enseñanza universitaria: Analíticas académicas y escenarios de futuro. Octaedro.
Bardin, L. (1986). El análisis de contenido. Akal.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bruner, J. (1986). Realidad mental y mundos posibles. Gedisa.
Castells, M. (1997). La era de la información: Economía, sociedad y cultura. Vol. I: La sociedad red. Alianza Editorial.
Coll, C., & Monereo, C. (Eds.). (2008). Psicología de la educación virtual: Aprender y enseñar con las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación. Morata.
Díaz Barriga Arceo, F. (2009). Reseña de: Coll, C. y Monereo, C. (Eds.) (2008). Psicología de la educación virtual. Revista d'Innovació i Recerca en Educació (REIRE), 3(2), 98-102.
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2002). El arte de formular preguntas esenciales. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Gallent-Torres, C., Zapata-González, A., & Ortego-Hernando, J. L. (2023). El impacto de la inteligencia artificial generativa en educación superior: una mirada desde la ética y la integridad académica. RELIEVE. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 29(2), art. M5. https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29134
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2024). La encrucijada de la Inteligencia Artificial en la educación superior: Del mito del plagio a la alfabetización mediática. Campus Virtuales, 13(1), 9-22.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza Torres, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill.
Imbernón, F. (2017). Ser docente en una sociedad compleja: La difícil tarea de enseñar. Graó.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT e inteligencia artificial en la educación superior: Guía de inicio rápido (ED/HE/IESALC/IP/2023/12). UNESCO IESALC.
Sánchez Mendiola, M., & Carbajal Degante, E. (2023). La inteligencia artificial generativa y la educación universitaria: ¿Salió el genio de la lámpara? Perfiles Educativos, 45(Especial), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2023.Especial.61692
Selwyn, N. (2020). ¿Deberían los robots sustituir al profesorado? La IA y el futuro de la educación. Ediciones Morata.
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. elearnspace. https://content.scirp.org/pdf/ce20110200005_57734762.pdf
UNESCO. (2024). Marco de competencias en inteligencia artificial para docentes. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura.
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2017). Authentic assessment: Creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396
Wertsch, J. V. (1988). Vygotsky y la formación social de la mente. Paidós.
Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. SAGE Publications.
Zabalza, M. A. (2003). Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario: Calidad y desarrollo profesional. Narcea Ediciones.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Electrónica Desafíos Educativos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
